Who is confused by the implementation of State III standards?


The State III standard has finally been fully implemented. The one-year implementation transition period is not long or short. At the enterprise technology level, most passenger car companies have been able to deal with it easily, and commercial vehicle companies have felt a deep sense of crisis. The quality of oil products is still not keeping up with the pace of technological upgrading of auto companies. The fact that the founding III cars have not been able to add State III oils is widespread across the country. Although State III has arrived, the task of energy conservation and emission reduction is still very arduous and long.

According to the provisions of the State Environmental Protection Administration, starting from July 1 last year, the country's third-phase emission standards for motor vehicle pollutants, that is, the national III emission standards. According to this standard, the total pollutant emission of bicycles will be reduced by more than 30% compared with State II vehicles. Given that automobile production and sales companies need to adapt to the period, the state grants a one-year transitional period to the State II vehicle. On July 1, this year, non-country III standard cars will no longer be allowed to use license plates.

According to the national III emission standard, the emission of carbon monoxide from a 2.0L family car will be reduced by 30% on the original basis, and the hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxides will be reduced by 40%. The national III standard motor vehicle exhaust emissions are only half of the national II standard motor vehicle exhaust emissions, which can greatly reduce the pollutant emissions of bicycles.

The implementation of the new standard does not affect the use of registered vehicles. The implementation of the State III standard is for newly registered vehicles. Previously registered old vehicles are still implemented in accordance with past standards. For example, Alto, the national II standard, is the so-called new car new. Standard, old car old standard.

The reporter learned that domestic passenger car companies have basically completed the technical upgrading of the National III standard. In Beijing, Guangzhou and other places, the State III standard was implemented in advance last year, and there is no problem of the delisting of the State II vehicles, and these big cities It is also a key area for almost all automotive enterprise market strategies. The National III standard was introduced to the whole country. There is actually no technical difficulty. For auto manufacturers, the inventory problem of the original State II vehicle is more troublesome. How to quickly digest these non-standard models and reduce the loss to The lowest, becoming the focus of the current work of the car manufacturers.

In the face of the implementation of the National III Standard, the major domestic joint ventures generally stated that “there is absolutely no problem in vehicle replacement”, and in many regions of the country, new emission standard models have already been shipped to the dealer’s store and are waiting for sales. The self-owned brands also performed well in environmental protection technologies. Relevant persons in charge of leading brands such as Chery, Brilliance, BYD and others told reporters that, even if they were facing State III, they would not be vague even if they faced State IV.

“We plan to put new vehicles on the market nationwide and plan to put some new cars in batches and sub-regions to replace the National II vehicles on the market. At present, due to earlier planning, there is no inventory of a national II vehicle in the factory. "The relevant person in charge of BYD told reporters.

Changan Automobile stated that the implementation of the National II Vehicle License Plate and the State III Vehicle has greatly changed the environmental awareness of the entire society and gradually brought it into line with the world. “As an automotive manufacturer, we believe that this reflects the responsibility of a company and promotes technological upgrading. At the Beijing auto show this year, the four new engines CA18, CB10, CB08 and CC15 demonstrated by Chang’an fully embody the advantages of environmental protection. The public demonstrated the strength of independent research and development of Changan Engine."

In terms of car technology, it is not difficult for China to deal with China III, and it has also created gasoline engines with independent intellectual property rights one after another. And we have been producing and researching diesel engines since the founding of New China, but we have always been lagging behind the National II standard. This also makes commercial vehicle companies that widely use diesel technology meet many obstacles in the process of technological upgrading. Relying on the purchase of technology to achieve the upgrade, but can not do a good match, it is difficult to gain a foothold in the market.

“Whether for the light passenger or the user, meeting the national III standard is only a necessary condition for energy conservation and emission reduction, but it is not a sufficient condition. The State III should not be the only indicator for a user to purchase a car.” Lin Wei, Secretary General of the China Light Vehicle Joint Analysis Association Indicated.

Lin Wei believes that emissions compliance is only the minimum standard. When purchasing commercial vehicles, it is also necessary to comprehensively examine whether the dynamic performance, fuel consumption level, and safety performance of the vehicles are synchronized and upgraded. Taking the fuel consumption index as an example, in order to highlight the fuel-saving performance of the vehicle as far as possible, under the premise of satisfying the national III indicator, some enterprises are mainly pushing gasoline engine products, and some enterprises have introduced diesel engines with lower power, and some companies have passed Reduce the weight of the vehicle to save fuel consumption. In fact, products with lower engine power and lighter weight have less fuel consumption under ideal conditions, but they are more difficult to drive when climbing and full load, and the rate of increase of fuel consumption is also very fast. The performance is not stable.

“Especially to reduce the weight, it will also cause some damage to the safety performance, which is an irresponsible behavior for the user.” Lin Wei pointed out that to provide users with models with excellent vehicle matching is the solution to the problem. The key lies.

Li Xinmin, deputy director of the Pollution Control Department of the State Environmental Protection Administration, said that at present, compared with gasoline vehicles, the emission regulations for diesel vehicles are significantly looser, and it is recommended that the “vehicle diesel” national standard for road diesel vehicles be revised as soon as possible, starting in 2008. Implementation.

“Compared with gasoline vehicles, the emission regulations for diesel vehicles are obviously loose; for light vehicle emissions standards issued by the State Environmental Protection Administration in 2005, for example, the nitrogen oxide limit value of light diesel vehicles in the national III standard limit is that of gasoline vehicles. 3 times more; lighter diesel vehicles emit about 100 times more particulate matter than a light-duty gasoline vehicle, Li Xinmin said.

The excessive sulfur content of automotive diesel fuel is a “bottleneck” that limits the development of emission control technologies for diesel vehicles and pollutant emission reduction. As China has not established a corresponding standard for low-sulfur automotive diesel, it has brought difficulties to the implementation of more stringent emission standards, and has made many advanced diesel technologies unavailable for use in China, especially diesel vehicle exhaust gas purification devices.

Compared with the technological upgrading of enterprises, the quality of domestic oil products remains a headache topic. The full implementation of the National III Standard prompted the enthusiasm of the automotive companies for technological R&D. However, for the oil companies, the State III did not exert any pressure on them, and the pace of its technological upgrading was significantly slower. It is understood that at present, only a few areas such as Beijing have reached the standard for oil products. There are certain problems in the short-term storage of fully qualified oil products. By the end of 2009, the country will be able to fully supply oil products that meet the requirements of the country III. In July 2004, when the National II emission standard was implemented, it was only a year later that the entire country supplied the II oil product.

Obviously, energy conservation and emission reduction is a systematic project, and only the national III compliance can not guarantee the efficiency and effectiveness of the overall energy conservation and consumption reduction. The situation of passenger car companies, commercial vehicle companies, and oil companies is now different. The most active response is still the most fully-automated car manufacturers; professional commercial vehicle companies are faced with the dilemma of lack of technology; and those oil companies with monopolistic advantages, are not on the arrival of the State III standard. So keen. When we drive a State III vehicle and fail to add State III oil, we only have to wait.
View related topics: State III standard commercial vehicle companies usher in new challenges